Defining Polycentricity

Understanding the difficulties investigating polycentric governance

Sixty years after its introduction in 1961, rigorous empirical studies of the causes or effects of polycentric governance remain few and far between. This discussion details several reasons why this complex concept and its wide-ranging implications have proven to be so hard to nail down with precision and suggests ways toward more rigorous investigations.

Difficulties discussed include defining and measuring the inter-connected dimensions of polycentric governance as concept and process, the ubiquity of substantial levels of complexity in all real-world systems of governance, the pervasive endogeneity of cause and effect in dynamic feedback systems, and mastering the “Goldilocks Effect” found at the sweet spot of system sustainability.

This concludes by reviewing several promising strands of research on the frontiers of governance science.

Watch more about Polycentricity on YouTube

Download the presentation slides

Supplemental materials on “Frontier of Governance Science”

Resources and bibliography

  1. Aligica, P.D. & V. Tarko. 2012. “Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, & Beyond.” Governance 25(2): 237-62.
  2. Aligica, P.D, and V. Tarko. 2013. “Co-Production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited.” American Political Science Review 107(4): 726–41.
  3. Aligica, P.D. 2014. Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond. Oxford.
  4. Aligica, P.D. 2019. Public Entrepreneurship, Citizenship, and Self-Governance, Cambridge.
  5. Aligica, P.D., P.J. Boettke, & V. Tarko 2019. Public Governance and the Classical-Liberal Perspective: Political Economy Foundations. Oxford University Press.
  6. Carlisle, K. & R.L. Gruby. 2017. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons.” Policy Studies Journal 10(2): 629.
  7. Cole, D.H. 2011. "From Global to Polycentric Climate Governance" Climate Law 2: 395-413.
  8. Cole, D.H. 2014. “Learning from Lin: Lessons and Cautions from the Natural Commons for the Knowledge Commons.” In Governing Knowledge Commons, edited by B.M. Frischmann, M.J. Madison, and K.J. Strandburg, 45–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Cole, D.H. & M.D. McGinnis, eds. 2015. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: Volume 1, Polycentricity in Public Administration and Political Science. Lexington Books.
  10. Folke, C.l, T. Hahn, P. Olsson, & J. Norberg. 2005. “Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30(1): 441–73.
  11. Garmestani, A,S. & M.H. Benson. 2013. “A Framework for Resilience-based Governance of Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology & Society 18(1).
  12. Jordan, A., D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster, eds. 2018. Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. McGinnis, M.D. 2011. “An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework,” Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 163-177. Updated version maintained at
  14. McGinnis, M.D. 2019. “Beyond a Precarious Balance: Improving the Scientific Rigor and Policy Relevance of Institutional Analyses from the Bloomington School.” In Ostrom’s Tensions: Reexamining the Political Economy and Public Policy of Elinor C. Ostrom, R.Q. Herzberg, P.J. Boettke, & P.D. Aligica, eds., Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University, chap. 1, pp. 19-72.
  15. Oakerson, R.J. & R.B. Parks. 2011. “The Study of Local Public Economies: Multi-organizational, Multi-level Institutional Analysis and Development.” Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 147–67.
  16. Ostrom, E. 1965. Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  17. _____. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge.
  18. _____. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton.
  19. Ostrom, E. 2006a. “A Frequently Overlooked Precondition of Democracy: Citizens Knowledgeable About and Engaged in Collective Action.” In Preconditions of Democracy, edited by Geoffrey Brennan, The Tampere Club Series, vol. 2, 75–89. Tampere, Finland: Tampere Univ. Press. Reprinted in Cole and McGinnis 2015.
  20. _____. 2006b. “Converting Threats into Opportunities.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39:1, 3-12.
  21. _____. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems” American Economic Review, 100, 641–72.
  22. _____. 2014. “Institutions and Sustainability of Ecological Systems.” In Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North, eds. S. Galiani and I. Sened, 84-106, Cambridge.
  23. Ostrom, V. 1973. "Can Federalism Make a Difference?" Publius 3(2): 197-237
  24. _____. 1988. “Executive Leadership, Authority Relationships, and Public Entrepreneurship,” originally published in VIncent Ostrom, edited by Barbara Allen, The Quest to Understand Human Affairs: Natural Resources Policy and Essays on Community and Collective Choice, Lexington Books, vol. 1, pp. 433-49. Reprinted in Cole and McGinnis, 2015, 217-232.
  25. _____. 1991.The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
  26. _____. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge.Michigan.
  27. _____. 2008a. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. 3rd ed. University of Alabama Press. (1st edition 1973; revised edition 1974; 2nd edition 1989).
  28. _____. 2008b. The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment. 3rd ed. Lanham MD: Lexington Books. (2nd edition 1989, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).
  29. Ostrom, V., C.M. Tiebout, & R. Warren. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 55.
  30. Pahl-Wostl, C. & C. Knieper. 2014. “The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes.” Global Environmental Change 29:139–54.
  31. Poteete, A., M. Janssen, & E. Ostrom. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton.
  32. Polanyi, M. 1951. The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. University of Chicago Press.
  33. Sarker, A. & W. Blomquist. 2019. “Addressing Misconceptions of Governing the Commons.” Journal of Institutional Economics 15(2).
  34. Stephan, M., G. Marshall, & M. McGinnis. 2019. “An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance.” In A. Thiel, W. Blomquist, and D. Garrick, eds. 2019. Governing Complexity. Cambridge University Press, chap. 1, pp. 21-44.
  35. Thiel, A., W. Blomquist, and D. Garrick, eds. 2019. Governing Complexity. Cambridge.
  36. Toonen, T.A.J. 1983. “Administrative Plurality in a Unitary State: The Analysis of Public Organizational Pluralism,” Policy & Politics 11: 247-271.